I somehow found myself on this page in my morning reading and, of course, immediately noticed the graphic showing the last 5 POTUS with a Roman name associate to them. Hmm, where to start: does anyone who knows even a little think the elder George Bush could be vaguely considered the great Augustus the first actual Roman Emperor. The problem with the graphic is the USA hasn't yet descended into the pit of chaos far enough to give an Augustus his opportunity to have a "revolution" and replace the Republic with an old fashion empire.
I thought at one time BO might be the USAs Augustus, no such luck. Remember when Augustus actually shifted the republic to an empire there was a massive blossoming of the arts, culture and all things I really like.
Likely I should just recognize that in my life time it will be just like Roman times and centuries of chaos and internal conflict before we get a real Augustus - if we should live so long, eh.