in a sensible way:
"The only tolerable way to shape the future of the Arctic is through international cooperation, not a sovereignty battle. There is more to protect than access to valuable resources and shortened shipping routes. There is a desperately endangered and fragile ecosystem as well, which is threatened both by global warming and by the commercial development warming allows.
Arctic in Retreat
New York Times
September 9, 2008
The editorial says that "... the Arctic is increasingly a scene of commercial and territorial conflict."
I guess I'd say there isn't any, what I'd call, real conflict, just yet, over the Arctic.
So far, other than the more detailed and slow routine like process of scientists presenting papers and findings of their sea floor mapping projects, there have only been dramatic gestures, lots and lots of words, massive hand wringing by Southerners worried about icebreakers and lack there of, images of the dastardly Russians in submarines with flags maybe stealing something(?) and, from Canada, a flurry of announcements about a beefed up military presents in places North of Toronto and Calgary. [The latest of these announcements from from the Defense Minister MacKay about a new reserve unit to be put, in of all places YK (YellowKnife). So Arctic, eh! Sorry, I am trying to contain my sarcasm.]
In fact if you just looked at the corporate media's headlines, least in Scotland, you might even think PM Harper had crossed to street from 24 Sussex Drive to dropped the writ at the GGs place yesterday morning because the new friendly Steve was worried about the Arctic - Canada's PM calls early election as race for Arctic's resources hots up - funny, eh.
For both the US and Canada the Arctic is again, after 100 years back on the front pages, almost daily it seems, of newspapers (Southerns are such opportunist), where as for some countries - Russia, for example, with an Arctic population of 2,000,000 - it has, in fact never been off so-to-speak.
I completely agree with the sentiment of the NYTs editorial. There is more to worry about in the Arctic than who owns what. For this concern there is also an agreed process to determining the important but prosaic issue. The danger, I think, is that important social and cultural issues will be stampeded over as the "gold rush" mentality of needed development looms on the horizon.
I think we here in Canada have until 2013 to make our final case under the UNCLOS (United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea) for the area we content, with Denmark, is linked to our continental shelf, i.e. the Lomonosov Ridge. I'm hoping other matters aren't lost sight of as we prepare our detailed scientific and geological case.
Technorati Tags: Arctic, Canada, Denmark - Greenland, Finland, Iceland, Law of the Sea, Norway, Russia, Sweden, UN, US - Alaska