I watched a clip of the Rachel Maddow show today. It's not something I do much, if ever. I guess the reason I did today was because the LRB tweeted a reference to it and I was curious why they would. The clip was Maddow speaking about the Madison WI protests and providing some background regarding how that State's fiscal deficit seems to have magically appeared since the November elections. Long story short, give aways to select segments of the local economy in terms of tax cuts thus lowering expected future revenues producing a situation in which expenditures will exceed revenue and voilà a deficit.
I found two elements interesting about the clip. First, Maddow developed a plausible story behind why the governor had, shortly after taking office, decided to lead his State into potentially difficult financial times by creating a revenue problem - i.e. giving some of the State's revenue away by lowering some taxes.
I suspect most of the world knows that raising government revenues to balance public service expenditures is a particular problem in the US. The vast majority of people in the country seem to want to consume public goods but very few want to pay anything for them so why create a problem, eh?
Rachel had set the stage in fairly short order that the governor wanted to pick a fight with public service unions by attacking their pension right contract provisions.
To move to the second element of the story she asked, rhetorically, why were the police and firefighters unions exempt from this particular dust-up? Hmm, yes why? Cause, of course, the brave people in blue and the iconic fire-eater heros had donated monies to the governor's run for the office in November. Had I mentioned that the governor is a Republican? No. Well he is. So, and this is the second element that interested me in the clip, she had built a creditable story quickly outlining all the connecting links within a fairly complex situation and was now able to deliver her conclusion. Which was: that the issue wasn't about being fiscally responsible in the face of incorrigible public sector employees but about destroying particular unions which support the Democratic Party and which may pose a problem in the upcoming 2012 federal election.
Now I think Maddow can construct a good storyline - Obama should hire her as a coach he needs help in this but that would require likely having a clear point-of-view - which, for me, pretty accurately describes the mess in WI. And I understand her sympathy for the Democratic Party but here I think she is talking about the Democratic Party from long long ago.
Remember Obama, or the Democrats, lost the union vote for Ted Kennedy's Senate seat. Wonder why? Likely because Obama never delivers anything for unions. Rather, he ensures that long fought for benefits, some unions sacrifice wages for, were undermined. Think of those "cadillac" health benefits which he made sure would be taxed under his faux health reform snafu.
MSM seems to be making a big deal out of the Obama comments made to a local TV station in Madison WI regarding the protests:
“Some of what I've heard coming out of Wisconsin, where you're just making it harder for public employees to collectively bargain generally seems like more of an assault on unions,” President Obama said Wednesday to WTMJ TV “And I think it's very important for us to understand that public employees, they're our neighbors, they're our friends.”
That's support?
Boy I could go all around that statement clockwise and not show any commitment to anything then spin around counter-clockwise and show just the opposite. Christ, this is a statement to signal his business support that he is just playing a political game for dumb hicks in the Mid-West. Note the touch of the Tucson great grief councillor: those union people - should have said folks - "... they're our neighbors, they're our friends". Gee whizz didn't BO just freeze the wages & salaries of "our neighbors ... our friends".
Anyone who falls for this shmegegge's malarkey is a shlimazel.
Note latest news as BO's flunkies started to spin his few short "I can go this away or that away" comments. Malarkey is malarkey: a word I'd expect BO, mainly raised by older people, would know if he known what a shellacking was, when he got whopped in November.